Workflow score
Workflow score = repetition + source quality + draft value + approval clarity - sensitivity risk.
Start first with high-repetition, high-source-quality, low-risk workflows.
Delay workflows that include counseling, crisis, children, finance, or ambiguous pastoral discernment.
AI ministry calculator output = safest first workflow plus next review milestone.
Inputs to collect
- Workflow repetition
- Source context quality
- Draft value
- Approval clarity
- Sensitivity risk
Outputs
- First workflow recommendation
- Risk notes
- Approval owner
- Next measurement checkpoint
How to use this tool
Step 1
Score value and repetition
Give higher scores to tasks that happen weekly and require similar preparation each time.
Step 2
Score risk separately
Subtract for sensitive data, pastoral ambiguity, child-specific content, finance, or counseling context.
Step 3
Pick the safest valuable workflow
Choose a workflow where Collie can draft useful work and staff can clearly approve or reject it.
Review checklist
- Is the workflow repeatable?
- Is the source data reliable?
- Can a person approve the result quickly?
- Does the workflow avoid protected categories?
Related questions
Which church workflow should use AI first?
Start with repeatable, low-risk preparation work such as visitor follow-up drafts, weekly communications, board prep, and volunteer coordination.
What makes a workflow too risky for church AI?
Workflows involving counseling, confessional content, specific children, finance decisions, crisis care, or unresolved pastoral judgment should stay outside AI automation.